A. Rowlerson et al., DIFFERENTIATION AND GROWTH OF MUSCLE IN THE FISH SPARUS-AURATA (L) .2. HYPERPLASTIC AND HYPERTROPHIC GROWTH OF LATERAL MUSCLE FROM HATCHINGTO ADULT, Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 16(3), 1995, pp. 223-236
Post-hatching growth of lateral muscle in a teleost fish, Sparus aurat
a (L) was studied morphometrically to identify and quantify muscle fib
re hyperplasia and hypertrophy, and by in vivo nuclear labelling with
5-bromo-deoxyuridine to identify areas of myoblast proliferation. Musc
le fibre types were identified principally by myosin ATPase histochemi
stry and immunostaining, and labelled nuclei were identified at light
and electronmicroscope level by immunostaining with a specific monoclo
nal antibody. Hyperplastic growth was slow at hatching, but then incre
ased to a maximum at the mid-point of larval life. Larval hyperplastic
growth occured by apposition of new fibres along proliferation zones,
principally just under the lateral line and in the apical regions of
the myotome, but also just under the superficial monolayer at intermed
iate positions. The first of these zones gave rise to slow and pink mu
scle fibres, in a process which continued through into postlarval life
. The other zones added new fibres to the fast-white muscle layer in a
process which was exhausted by the end of larval life. Post-larvally,
between 60 and 90 days posthatching, a new hyperplastic process start
ed in the fast-white muscle as nuclei proliferated and new muscle fibr
es were formed throughout the whole layer. This process resulted in a
several-fold increase in the number of fast-white fibres over a few we
eks, and then waned to very low levels in juveniles. Hyperplasia by ap
position continued for some time postlarvally on the deep surface of t
he superficial monolayer, but at this stage gave rise to slow fibres o
nly. Hypertrophic growth occurred at all ages, but was the dominant me
chanism of muscle growth only in the juvenile and adult stages. Mechan
isms giving rise to these different growth processes in fish muscle ar
e discussed, and compared with muscle development in higher vertebrate
s.