G. Katul et al., ESTIMATION OF SURFACE HEAT AND MOMENTUM FLUXES USING THE FLUX-VARIANCE METHOD ABOVE UNIFORM AND NONUNIFORM TERRAIN, Boundary - layer meteorology, 74(3), 1995, pp. 237-260
Eddy-correlation measurements above an uneven-aged forest, a uniform-i
rrigated bare soil field, and within a grass-covered forest clearing w
ere used to investigate the usefulness of the flux-variance method abo
ve uniform and non-uniform terrain. For this purpose, the Monin and Ob
ukhov (1954) variance similarity functions were compared with direct m
easurements. Such comparisons were in close agreement for momentum and
heat but not for water vapor. Deviations between measured and predict
ed similarity functions for water vapor were attributed to three facto
rs: 1) the active role of temperature in surface-layer turbulence, 2)
dissimilarity between sources and sinks of heat and water vapor at the
ground surface, and 3) the non-uniformity in water vapor sources and
sinks. It was demonstrated that the latter non-uniformity contributed
to horizontal gradients that do not scale with the vertical flux. Thes
e three factors resulted in a turbulence regime that appeared more eff
icient in transporting heat than water vapor for the dynamic convectiv
e sublayer but not for the dynamic sublayer. The agreement between edd
y-correlation measured and flux-variance predicted sensible heat flux
was better than that for latent heat flux at all three sites. The flux
-variance method systematically overestimated the latent heat flux whe
n compared to eddy-correlation measurements. It was demonstrated that
the non-uniformity in water vapor sources reduced the surface flux whe
n compared to an ''equivalent'' uniform terrain subjected to identical
shear stress, sensible heat flux, and atmospheric water vapor varianc
e. Finally, the correlation between the temperature and water vapor fl
uctuations was related to the relative efficiency of surface-layer tur
bulence in removing heat and water vapor. These relations were used to
assess critical assumptions in the derivation of the flux-variance fo
rmulation.