Infection continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in
neutropenic patients following chemotherapy or bone marrow transplanta
tion (BMT). Concerted efforts have been made to protect these patients
from infection during the neutropenic period. Elaborate protocols to
protect the patient from both intrinsic and extrinsic pathogens have b
een devised, ranging from simple single room isolation to laminar air
flow units (LAFs), in association with varying degrees of antibiotic d
econtamination of the digestive tract. Comparative rates of infection
using these techniques have varied in different studies, and their use
has been somewhat controversial. More recently, prophylactic quinolon
e administration to neutropenic patients has significantly decreased t
he incidence of both Gram-negative septicaemia and pyrexial episodes,
probably superseding any advantages which may have been conferred by p
revious regimens. LAFs with high efficiency particulate air filtration
still appear to be the best means of protection against aspergillosis
, but are expensive and would not be available for the majority of neu
tropenic patients. They should probably be allocated to patients who a
re most at risk; BMT recipients or others who may be expected to have
a prolonged neutropenic period.