Ng. Papadopoulos et al., BIOASSAY VS IMMUNOASSAY FOR QUANTIFICATION OF INTERLEUKIN-6 IN BIOLOGICAL-FLUIDS, Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 9(4), 1995, pp. 234-237
As several possible prognostic and therapeutic applications of interle
ukin-6 are currently under trial, the available methods for its quanti
fication in biological fluids should be evaluated. In this report, the
7TD1 hybridoma bioassay is compared to an enzyme immunoassay for the
determination of interleukin-6 in serum and plasma of normal subjects
and patients with cancer, sepsis, and systemic lupus erythematosus, as
well as in malignant pleural effusions and culture supernatants. The
results show a good correlation between the two methods in all cases.
Mean values of the examined groups were statistically different betwee
n the assays only in the case of septic patients. This may be attribut
ed either to the influence of other molecules on the assays or to the
nonlinearity of the dose-response curves. Since immunoassays are easie
r to perform, it seems that they are more suitable for routine use, th
e bioassay being preferable in cases where increased sensitivity is re
quired. (C) 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.