Af. Engel et al., RELATIONSHIP OF SYMPTOMS IN FECAL INCONTINENCE TO SPECIFIC SPHINCTER ABNORMALITIES, International journal of colorectal disease, 10(3), 1995, pp. 152-155
We aimed to determine if the type of clinical presentation in patients
with faecal incontinence correlated with the underlying sphincter pat
hology. One hundred fifty one consecutive patients (129 female) with f
aecal incontinence were classified as having either passive (faecal in
continence without the patient's knowledge) or urge incontinence (inco
ntinence occurring with the patient's awareness, against their will be
cause of lack of voluntary control), and were investigated by routine
anorectal physiological testing and anal endosonography. Sixty six pat
ients had passive incontinence (PI) only, 42 patients had urge inconti
nence (UI) only, 38 patients had combined passive and urge incontinenc
e, and 5 patients had soiling after defaecation only. Patients with PI
alone (n = 66) were significantly older than those with UI alone (PI
vs UI, 60 vs 42 yr, p < 0.001), had a lower max imum resting anal pres
sure (51 vs 64 cm H2O, means, p = 0.02) and had a significantly (p < 0
.00 1) greater prevalence of internal anal sphincter (IAS) defects. Pa
tients with UI alone (It = 42) had a significantly lower maximum volun
tary contraction pressure (PI v UI, 72 v 42 cm H2O, p < 0.001), and a
significantly (p < 0.001) greater prevalence of external anal sphincte
r (EAS) defects. The clinical classification of faecal incontinence in
to passive and urge incontinence relates to specific patterns of abnor
mality of the internal and external anal sphincters.