Lct. Fung et al., CONTRADICTORY SUPRANORMAL NUCLEAR RENOGRAPHIC DIFFERENTIAL RENAL-FUNCTION - FACT OR ARTIFACT, The Journal of urology, 154(2), 1995, pp. 667-670
We previously reported contradictory supranormal nuclear renographic d
ifferential renal function in cases of unilateral hydroureteronephrosi
s, in which the kidneys with hydroureteronephrosis paradoxically had a
greater differential function than the contralateral normal mate, bas
ed on diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) nuclear renography. To
evaluate whether DTPA supranormal differential function represented t
rue hyperfunction, patients with DTPA supranormal differential functio
n were evaluated with dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) nuclear renograph
y and the results were compared. A total of 16 patients with unilatera
l hydronephrosis was identified to have DTPA differential function of
53% or more, They were younger than age 1 year and had never undergone
any urological surgery, In all 16 patients the DMSA differential func
tion (mean 51.1%, range 42 to 57%) was lower than their own correspond
ing DTPA differential function (mean 58.3%, range 53 to 66%, p < 0.000
1). In addition, the DMSA differential function was not significantly
different from the intuitively anticipated mean of 50% (p = 0.48). The
DTPA supranormal differential function identified in our patients was
not corroborated, by the DMSA differential function, With recent evid
ence that DMSA differential function may be a better predictor of outc
ome following relief of unilateral ureteral obstruction consideration
should be given to using DMSA as a potentially more relevant method fo
r differential function measurement in the setting of unilateral hydro
nephrosis. Conversely, until the potential deficiencies of DTPA are fu
lly understood caution should be exercised in the interpretation of DT
PA differential function in the setting of hydronephrosis.