During the past year, several excellent reviews have been published on
various aspects of esophageal cancer treatment. Pathologic examinatio
n of lymph nodes after extensive resections has reconfirmed the early
lymphatic spread at a relatively large distance of the primary tumor.
Approximately 50% of the patients with intrathoracic tumors invading t
he submucosa have positive lymph nodes, half of which are located outs
ide the chest. It has been demonstrated that patients with a limited n
umber of positive nodes can be cured by extensive surgery at the cost
of increased morbidity and mortality, even in experienced hands. Altho
ugh the effectiveness of surveillance programs for patients with Barre
tt's mucosa is still unclear, both tumor classification and survival a
ppear to be more favorable in patients who were referred from surveill
ance programs as compared with patients who had not been in such progr
ams. The role of video-assisted thoracic surgery seems to be limited t
o diagnostic procedures. Prolonged collapse of the lung during video-a
ssisted thoracic surgery-esophagectomy induces severe pulmonary compli
cations. The role of primary radiotherapy is limited, but favorable re
sults have been described in the treatment of early tumors. Primary ch
emoradiation can achieve a high frequency of local tumor resolution, a
lbeit at the expense of high toxicity. Both after limited and en-bloc
resection, locoregional recurrence is most frequently accompanied by d
istant metastases, underlining the need for (neo)adjuvant systemic the
rapy. Preoperative chemotherapy has resulted in a 45% (partial) respon
se rate. Several phase II trials have tested the efficacy of preoperat
ive chemoradiotherapy. The disappointing results of two studies indica
te that the treatment should be aggressive to reach a substantial impr
ovement of survival.