G. Pados et al., EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT OVARIAN STIMULATION PROTOCOLS FOR IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION, Gynecological endocrinology, 9(2), 1995, pp. 103-112
In this study we evaluated retrospectively the efficacy of five differ
ent ovarian stimulation protocols in an in vitro fertilization program
, in which 512 women were involved. Ovulation was induced by the follo
wing protocols: group I (271 cycles): buserelin short protocol (1 mg/d
ay, intranasally) with human menopausal gonadotropin/ human chorionic
gonadotropin (hMG/hCG); group II (45 cycles): buserelin (shout protoco
l) with pure follicle stimulating hormone (p-FSH)/hMG/hCG; group III (
24 cycles): clomiphene citrate (100 mg/day) with hMG/hCG; group IV (12
2 cycles): hMG (3 amples/day) and hCG; group V (113 cycles): hMG/hCG a
nd prednisolone (7.5 mg/day) after cycle programming with oval contrac
eptives. The lowest cancellation rate (3.3%) was noted in group I, fol
lowed by group V (9.7%). The highest number of follicles was observed
in groups I (8.3 +/- 0.3; mean +/- SEM) and V (7.8 +/- 0.5). Also, mor
e oocytes were retrieved in group I (7.2 +/- 9.3, p < 0.001), which we
re of good quality based on oocyte maturity as well as on the fertiliz
ation rate, and more embryos (4.5 +/- 0.3, p < 0.05) were developed. T
he correlation between estradiol and the total follicular volume on th
e day of hCG administration was also examined in the five groups. The
best correlation (r = 0.6502) was found in group I, followed by group
V (r = 0.5810). Significant differences were observed in the five grou
ps with regard to the number of hMG ampules administered (p < 0.0001,
F = 15.393) and the stimulation days (p < 0.0001, F = 35.32). Sixty-si
x clinical pregnancies weve achieved: 37 (17.5%) in group I, seven (25
.9%) in group II, one (10%) in group III, ten (15.6%) in group IV and
11 (15.5%) in group V (differences were not statistically significant)
. In conclusion, all five protocols were satisfactory in ovarian stimu
lation for in vitro fertilization, and gonadotropin releasing hormone
(GnRH) analogs seemed to be move advantageous by reducing the cancella
tion rate, enhancing the number of oocytes retrieved and embryos devel
oped and by improving the pregnancy rates.