Iw. Hughes et al., FIRST-LINE TREATMENT IN ACUTE NON-DYSENTERIC DIARRHEA - CLINICAL COMPARISON OF LOPERAMIDE OXIDE, LOPERAMIDE AND PLACEBO, British journal of clinical practice, 49(4), 1995, pp. 181-185
The use of antimicrobial agents for the treatment of acute diarrhoea h
as become more common with the introduction of quinolone compounds, wh
ich are active against most types of bacterial pathogens, Despite the
fact that such drugs have been used for empirical therapy or even for
prophylaxis, current opinion would restrict their use to specific grou
ps of patients who are likely to show particular benefit from them. No
n-specific therapy seems a more appropriate initial treatment for case
s of acute, non-dysenteric diarrhoea, Clinical trial data are presente
d here comparing the effects of loperamide oxide 1 and 2 mg to those o
f placebo and loperamide 2 mg in this condition, All the drug preparat
ions were significantly superior to placebo, in particular reducing th
e time to complete relief of symptoms to about 24 hours, as opposed to
45 hours on placebo treatment. Of these preparations, loperamide oxid
e 1 mg is to be preferred, as it produces fewer constipation-like epis
odes after treatment. The introduction of loperamide oxide 1 mg repres
ents a useful advance in the non-specific treatment of acute, non-dyse
nteric diarrhoea.