Bs. Sathyaprakash et al., GRAVITATIONAL-INSTABILITY IN THE STRONGLY NONLINEAR REGIME - A STUDY OF VARIOUS APPROXIMATIONS, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 275(2), 1995, pp. 463-482
We study the development of gravitational instability in the strongly
non-linear regime. For this purpose we use a number of statistical ind
icators such as filamentary statistics, the spectrum of overdense/unde
rdense regions and the void probability function, each of which probes
a particular aspect of gravitational clustering. We use these statist
ical indicators to discriminate between different approximations to gr
avitational instability which we test against N-body simulations. The
approximations that we test are the truncated Zel'dovich approximation
(TZ), the adhesion approximation (AA), and the frozen flow (FF) and l
inear potential (LP) approximations. Of these we find that FF and LP b
reak down relatively early, soon after the non-linear length scale exc
eeds R - the mean distance between peaks of the gravitational potenti
al. The reason for this breakdown is easy to understand: particles in
FF are constrained to follow the streamlines of the initial velocity f
ield. Shell crossing is absent in this case and structure gradually fr
eezes as particles begin to collect near minima of the gravitational p
otential. In LP, particles follow the lines of force of the primordial
potential, oscillating about its minima at late times when the non-li
near length scale k(NL)(-1) similar or equal to R. Unlike FF and LP,
the adhesion model (and to some extent TZ) continues to give accurate
results even at late times when k(NL)(-1) greater than or equal to R
This is because both AA and TZ use the presence of long-range modes in
the gravitational potential to move particles. Thus, as long as the i
nitial potential has sufficient long-range power to initiate large-sca
le coherent motions, TZ and AA will remain approximately valid. In rel
ation to AA, TZ suffers from a single major drawback - it underestimat
es the presence of small clumps. Similarly, it predicts the right mean
density in large voids but misses subcondensations within them. The r
eason for this is clear: the artificial removal of power on scales sma
ller than k(NL)(-1) in the initial potential in TZ, designed to preven
t shell crossing, causes a substantial fraction of matter (which would
have been clustered in N-body simulations) to lie within low-density
regions at all epochs. On the other hand, TZ is very fast to implement
and more accurately predicts the location of large objects at late ti
mes; AA more correctly represents the subcondensations but does not al
ways accurately predict their positions.