AN AXIAL VELOCITY ESTIMATOR FOR ULTRASOUND BLOOD-FLOW IMAGING, BASED ON A FULL EVALUATION OF THE DOPPLER EQUATION BY MEANS OF A 2-DIMENSIONAL AUTOCORRELATION APPROACH
T. Loupas et al., AN AXIAL VELOCITY ESTIMATOR FOR ULTRASOUND BLOOD-FLOW IMAGING, BASED ON A FULL EVALUATION OF THE DOPPLER EQUATION BY MEANS OF A 2-DIMENSIONAL AUTOCORRELATION APPROACH, IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 42(4), 1995, pp. 672-688
This paper introduces a new velocity estimator, referred to as the 2D
autocorrelator, which differs from conventional Doppler techniques in
two respects: the derivation of axial velocity values by evaluating th
e Doppler equation using explicit estimates of both the mean Doppler a
nd the mean RF frequency at each range gate location; and, the 2D natu
re (depth samples versus pulse transmissions) of processing within the
range gate, The estimator's output can be calculated by evaluating th
e 2D autocorrelation function of the demodulated (baseband) backscatte
red echoes at two lags, A full derivation and mathematical description
of the estimator is presented, based on the framework of the 2D Fouri
er transform, The same framework is adopted to analyze two other estab
lished velocity estimators (the conventional 1D autoeorrelator and the
crosscorrelator) in a unifying manner, and theoretical arguments as w
ell as experimental results are used to highlight the common aspects o
f all three estimators, In addition, a thorough performance evaluation
is carried out by means of extensive simulations, which document the
effect of a number of factors (velocity spread, range gate length, ens
emble length, noise level, transmitted bandwidth) and provide an insig
ht into the optimum parameters and trade-offs associated with individu
al algorithms. Overall, the 2D autocorrelator is shown to offer the be
st performance in the context of the specific simulation conditions co
nsidered here, Its superiority over the crosscorrelator is restricted
to cases of low signal-to-noise ratios, However, the 2D autocorrelator
always outperforms the conventional 1D autocorrelator by a significan
t margin, These comparisons, when linked to the computational requirem
ents of the proposed estimator, suggest that it combines the generally
higher performance of 2D broadband time-domain techniques with the re
latively modest complexity of 1D narrowband phase-domain velocity esti
mators.