Mm. Rahman et al., CONJUNCTIVAL IMPRESSION CYTOLOGY FAILS TO DETECT SUBCLINICAL VITAMIN-A-DEFICIENCY IN YOUNG-CHILDREN, The Journal of nutrition, 125(7), 1995, pp. 1869-1874
Thirty-four asymptomatic children, ages 5-35 mo, were studied to compa
re the conjunctival impression cytology technique with the relative do
se response test in detection of subclinical vitamin A deficiency. Con
junctival smears were collected from the infero-temporal-bulbar conjun
ctiva of each eye with a strip of cellulose acetate filter paper and t
ransferred onto a glass slide. Venous blood was drawn at 0 and 5 h aft
er administration of an oral dose of 1000 mu g of retinol palmitate (r
elative dose response test). An increase in serum retinol concentratio
n (greater than or equal to 20%) in the 5-h value was considered indic
ative of an inadequate liver store of vitamin A and hence subclinical
vitamin A deficiency. Of the 34 children, 26 (76.5%) had moderate to s
evere protein-energy malnutrition. Only three children (9%) had abnorm
al conjunctival impression cytology, whereas 23 (68%) had abnormal rel
ative dose response. Even more striking was the finding that only two
of the 23 children with abnormal relative dose response had abnormal c
onjunctival impression cytology. The results suggest that the conjunct
ival impression cytology test has poor agreement with the relative dos
e response test results in assessing vitamin A status in young childre
n. If relative dose response is considered an acceptable reference met
hod for assessing vitamin A status, then the conjunctival impression c
ytology test cannot be considered a valid measure of subclinical vitam
in A deficiency in this population.