SUSCEPTIBILITY OF ROOT-KNOT AND CYST NEMATODES TO THE NEMATODE-TRAPPING FUNGI MONACROSPORIUM-ELLIPSOSPORUM AND M-CIONOPAGUM

Citation
Ba. Jaffee et Ae. Muldoon, SUSCEPTIBILITY OF ROOT-KNOT AND CYST NEMATODES TO THE NEMATODE-TRAPPING FUNGI MONACROSPORIUM-ELLIPSOSPORUM AND M-CIONOPAGUM, Soil biology & biochemistry, 27(8), 1995, pp. 1083-1090
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Soil Science
Journal title
ISSN journal
00380717
Volume
27
Issue
8
Year of publication
1995
Pages
1083 - 1090
Database
ISI
SICI code
0038-0717(1995)27:8<1083:SORACN>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
We compared the susceptibility of Meloidogyne javanica and Heterodera schachtii to the nematode-trapping fungi Monacrosporium ellipsosporum and M. cionopagum. The fungi were added in the form of fungal-colonize d nematodes or hyphae pelletized in alginate to field soil in small vi als. Suppression by the fungi was measured by comparing nematode invas ion of roots in fungal treated and untreated soil. Meloidogyne javanic a was much more susceptible than H. schachtii to both fungi, regardles s of the form of fungal inoculum. Thus, when colonized nematodes were used as fungal inoculum, suppression of M. javanica and H. schachtii w as 92 and 6% by M. ellipsosporum and 54 and 0% by M. cionapagum. Simil arly, when pelletized hyphae were used, suppression of M. javanica and H. schachtii was 80 and 10% by M. ellipsosporum and 98 and 24% by M. cionopagum. In other tests, two additional populations of H, schachtii were relatively resistant and two additional species of root-knot nem atode, M. incognita and M. chitwoodi, were relatively susceptible to t hese fungi. The results indicate that Meloidogyne spp in general are m ore susceptible than H. schachtii to M. ellipsosporum and M. cionopagu m.