Recent speech research has begun to evaluate the internal structure of
categories. In one such study, Xuhl (1991) found that discrimination
was poorer for vowel stimuli that were more representative of the cate
gory (prototype, or P, set) than it was for less representative stimul
i (nonprototype, or NP, set). This finding was interpreted as indicati
ng that a category prototype may function as a ''perceptual magnet,''
effectively decreasing perceptual distance, and thus discriminability,
between stimuli. The present study examines the function of prototype
s in a musical category-another natural, but nonspeech category. Paral
leling the Kuhl study, representative (P) and less representative (NP)
sets of major triad stimuli were constructed, based on equal temperam
ent. Musically experienced subjects rated the stimuli in each set for
goodness as a major triad, with the highest rated stimulus serving as
a prototype standard for a subsequent discrimination task. Results hom
the discrimination task demonstrated better performance in the P cont
ext than in the NP context. The current nonspeech results indicate tha
t a prototype functions as an anchor rather than a magnet. In addition
to providing a natural, nonspeech standard for comparison with speech
findings, the results provide some important insights into the nature
of musical categories.