Jk. Burgoon et al., EFFECTS OF PREINTERACTION EXPECTANCIES AND TARGET COMMUNICATION ON PERCEIVER RECIPROCITY AND COMPENSATION IN DYADIC INTERACTION, Journal of experimental social psychology, 31(4), 1995, pp. 287-321
The current investigation examined the influence of expectancies and t
arget communication on perceiver behavior during social interaction. T
wo common adaptation patterns in interpersonal interaction are recipro
city and compensation, both of which may occur in response to another'
s interaction behavior or in anticipation of it. Expectancy signaling
literature predicts that perceivers should initially reciprocate the b
ehaviors they expect from a target. Strategic communication models pre
dict that perceivers induced to hold preinteraction expectancies will
reciprocate expected pleasant behavior but compensate for anticipated
unpleasant behavior. Interaction adaptation theories hold that perceiv
ers will adapt their behavior to the target's actual (rather than expe
cted) communication, reciprocating desired behavior as a way of reinfo
rcing it and compensating undesired behavior as a way of modeling the
preferred pattern, Expectancy violations theory holds that the choice
of interaction pattern will also be moderated by the rewardingness of
the target. An experiment crossed positive and negative preinteraction
expectancies with greatly increased pleasantness (a positive violatio
n) or decreased pleasantness (a negative violation) by target confeder
ates. Overall, results conformed most closely to the interpersonal ada
ptation theory explanation, with some influence also due to target val
ence and violation status. Perceivers interacting with pleasant target
s reciprocated increased pleasantness initially and over time. Those i
nteracting with unpleasant targets (a) matched the target in adopting
a lower level of pleasantness/involvement on average, (b) showed modes
t compensation or nonadaptation on channel-specific measures but recip
rocity on global ones over time, and (c) showed the most compensation
when the unpleasant behavior followed a positive expectancy. Preintera
ction expectancies yielded modest effects but did intensify or attenua
te results relative to their absence, a conclusion corroborated by int
raclass correlation analyses. (C) 1995 Academic Press, Inc.