SELFHOOD AND IDENTITY IN CONFUCIANISM, TAOISM, BUDDHISM, AND HINDUISM- CONTRASTS WITH THE WEST

Authors
Citation
Dyf. Ho, SELFHOOD AND IDENTITY IN CONFUCIANISM, TAOISM, BUDDHISM, AND HINDUISM- CONTRASTS WITH THE WEST, Journal for the theory of social behaviour, 25(2), 1995, pp. 115-139
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Social
ISSN journal
00218308
Volume
25
Issue
2
Year of publication
1995
Pages
115 - 139
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-8308(1995)25:2<115:SAIICT>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
This article explores conceptions of selfhood and identity originating from four intellectual traditions: the relational self in Confucianis m, selflessness in Taoism, self-renunciation in Buddhism, and Atman-Br ahman identity in Hinduism. It compares these conceptions with one ano ther and with the core of Western conceptions pertaining to: (a) subje ct-object distinction, (b) self-other demarcation and individual ident ity, and (c) the centrality and sovereignty of the self. Psychological decentering is identified as a unifying theme underlying Eastern conc eptions of selfhood. A beginning step toward the reconstruction of the self informed by the four traditions promises to enlarge our horizons about the self and its place in society, nature, and the cosmos.