Three reductones, ihydroxy-4,4-diphenyl-2,5-cyclohexadien-1-one(11), 3
,4-dihydroxycoumarin (35), and 3,4-dihydroxyspiro[5.5]undecan-3-en-4-o
ne (64), were prepared and subsequently reacted with superoxide anion
radical(O-2(.-)), generated from KO2 and 18-crown-6 polyether. The rea
ctions were carried out in aprotic media and quenched with methyl iodi
de which facilitates the trapping of the various oxyanions formed. Whi
le a plethora of products were formed in each case roxy-2-methyl-4,4-d
iphenyl-5-cyclohexene-1,3-dione (17), dimethyl 4,4-diphenylglutaconate
(18), methyl 4,4-diphenyl-3-butenoate (19), phenylcinnamaldehyde (20)
, methyl 3-phenylcinnamate (21), and benzophenone (22) from 11; 3-hydr
oxy-2-methoxycoumarin (39), 2-carbomethoxy-2-hydroxy-3-coumaranone (40
), 2-hydroxy-2-methyl-3-coumaranone (41), methyl o-hydroxyphenylglyoxy
late (42), methyl salicylate (43), and catechol (44) from 35; and 2,4-
dihydroxyspiro[5.5]undeca-1,4-dien-3-one (66), 2-hydroxyspiro[4.5]dec-
1-en-3-one (70), dimethyl 1,1-cyclohexanediacetate (73), and dimethyl
alpha-keto-1-[(methoxycarbonyl)methyl]cyclohexane (75) from 64], an ov
erall analysis of the product distribution indicates that the basic el
ements of the reaction sequence are the same. The first step involves
facile deprotonation and the concomitant generation of the reductone m
onoanion, a process which lends support to the suggestion of Afanas'ev
and co-workers (Afanas'ev, I. B.; Grabovetskii, V. V.; Kuprianova, N.
S. J. Chem. Sec. Perkin Trans. 2 1987, 281-285). Oxidation of this mo
noanion yields the corresponding triketone. Of the various options ava
ilable to this polyketone, superoxide attack at the most electrophilic
central carbonyl followed by oxidative cleavage and/or benzylic acid
rearrangement are clearly the most prominent. These are followed by a
variety of base catalyzed autoxidative processes which are highly depe
ndent on the nature of the substrate.