AERODYNAMIC MEASUREMENTS OF METHYL-BROMIDE VOLATILIZATION FROM TARPEDAND NONTARPED FIELDS

Citation
Ms. Majewski et al., AERODYNAMIC MEASUREMENTS OF METHYL-BROMIDE VOLATILIZATION FROM TARPEDAND NONTARPED FIELDS, Journal of environmental quality, 24(4), 1995, pp. 742-752
Citations number
43
Categorie Soggetti
Environmental Sciences
ISSN journal
00472425
Volume
24
Issue
4
Year of publication
1995
Pages
742 - 752
Database
ISI
SICI code
0047-2425(1995)24:4<742:AMOMVF>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Methyl bromide (MeBr) is used extensively in agriculture as a soil fum igant and there is growing concern over the role it may play in the de pletion of stratospheric ozone. Methyl bromide is applied using variou s techniques and very little is known about how much of the applied fu migant volatilizes into the atmosphere after the application. This hel d study was designed to estimate the post-application methyl bromide v olatilization loss rates from two different application practices. The fields were approximately 6 km apart in Monterey County, California, and were treated in conformity with local practices as of 1992. The Me Br was injected at a depth of 25 to 30 cm. One field was covered simul taneously with a high-barrier plastic film tarp during the application , and the other was left uncovered, but the furrows made by the inject ion shanks were bedded over. Volatilization fluxes were estimated usin g an aerodynamic-gradient technique immediately following the completi on of the application process and continued for 9 d for the tarped hel d and 6 d for the nontarped held. The cumulative volatilization losses from the tarped held were 22% of the nominal application within the f irst 5 d of the experiment and about 32% of the nominal application wi thin 9 d including the one day after the tarp was removed on Day 8 aft er application. In contrast, the nontarped field lost 89% of the nomin al application by volatilization in 5 d. The volatilization rate from the tarped field was shown to be significantly lower than the nontarpe d field at a 95% confidence level.