Gd. Smith et Mt. Smith, MORPHINE-3-GLUCURONIDE - EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT ITS PUTATIVE ROLE IN THEDEVELOPMENT OF TOLERANCE TO THE ANTINOCICEPTIVE EFFECTS OF MORPHINE IN THE RAT, Pain, 62(1), 1995, pp. 51-60
Antinociceptive tolerance to morphine (MOR) was induced in groups of S
prague-Dawley rats receiving continuous intravenous infusions of morph
ine sulphate administered by 3 different MOR dosing regimes. At approp
riate intervals throughout each infusion period, antinociceptive testi
ng was performed using the tail-flick latency test and blood samples w
ere collected. Groups of saline (SAL)-infused control rats also underw
ent antinociceptive testing and blood sample collection Complete antin
ociceptive tolerance developed during each MOR infusion period and was
characterized by a marked decline in the degree of antinociception fr
om values greater than 90% of the maximum possible effect (%MPE) to pr
e-dosing baseline values, By contrast, %MPE values in SAL-infused cont
rol animals and in sham-operated rats were not significantly different
from pre-dosing values throughout the infusion period, indicating tha
t the experimental procedures themselves did not contribute to the dev
elopment of antinociceptive tolerance to MOR. In addition, the rate of
MOR tolerance development was inversely proportional to the MOR infus
ion rate. A very significant inverse relationship was observed between
the mean degree of antinociception (%MPE) and the mean plasma molar c
oncentration ratio, [morphine-3-glucuronide]/[MOR], for each of the 3
MOR dosing regimes and for the cumulated data. This relationship showe
d that near-maximum antinociception was attainable at ratio values les
s than approximately 0.50, whilst at ratio values above approximately
1.5, little or no antinociception was observed. Although %MPE was high
ly inversely correlated with the mean plasma morphine-3-glucuronide (M
3G) concentrations for rats receiving regimes A and B, this was not th
e case for rats receiving regime C where antinociceptive tolerance was
partially reversed by an increase in the morphine infusion rate part-
way through the infusion period. In addition, a poor relationship was
observed between %MPE and the mean plasma MOR concentration, possibly
due to the confounding presence of M3G in all samples. Thus, we may co
nclude from this study in Sprague-Dawley rats that irrespective of the
rate of antinociceptive tolerance development, the level of antinocic
eption achievable appears to be highly inversely correlated with the m
ean [M3G]/[MOR] plasma molar concentration ratio and poorly correlated
with the plasma MOR concentration, consistent with the notion that it
is perhaps the balance between the excitatory effects of M3G and the
inhibitory effects of MOR at the functional level which is the importa
nt determinant. Further research is required in carefully conducted st
udies in cancer patients to evaluate the possible contribution of the
MOR metabolites, M3G and morphine-6-glucuronide (MbG), to increasing d
osing requirements of MOR. Other factors such as disease progression a
nd increasing psychological distress must also be borne in mind, as th
ese will have a major influence on increasing dosing requirements of M
OR in cancer patients (Portenoy 1994).