Background and Objectives. A rabbit chronic model has been developed f
or investigation of epidural anesthesia without surgery. Methods. A ca
theter was implanted via a nontraumatic route in the lumbar epidural s
pace between the apex coccis sacri and the first vertebra coccygea aft
er a 1-cm incision was made in the skin at the root of the tail. The l
igamentum was punctured to allow the catheter to slide gently 10 cm in
to the epidural space and avoid subperiosteal soft tissue dissection.
The motor block effects of epidural lidocaine and bupivacaine were stu
died 1 week after implantation. Three injections of lidocaine 1% (grou
p I) or 2% (group II) or bupivacaine 0.25% (group III) or 0.5% (group
IV) were given at 48-hour intervals to four rabbits in each group. Inc
reasing concentrations (0.5%, 1.0%, and 2.0%) of lidocaine and bupivac
aine (0.125, 0.25, and 0.5%) were injected into eight rabbits in each
of groups V and VI. The spinal cord and meninges were examined histopa
thologically in eight other chronically implanted rabbits that receive
d no drugs. Results. Catheters were kept in place during 2 months in 4
0 rabbits without neurologic disturbance, discomfort, infection or wei
ght loss. Complete motor block was observed during a mean 27, 43, and
51 minutes with increasing doses of lidocaine. Administration of bupiv
acaine 0.125% led to incomplete motor deficit in three rabbits, wherea
s all other rabbits exhibited complete motor block, lasting a mean of
26, 53, and 93 minutes for increasing doses. Linear relationships were
found between the concentration of each drug and the duration of moto
r block (r = .902, P < .001 for lidocaine; and r = .857, P < .001 for
bupivacaine). Repeated injections of local anesthetics produced consis
tent durations of motor block (Bland and Altman test). No significant
histologic changes were observed. Conclusion. This rabbit model appear
s to be a suitable tool for evaluating motor block of epidural agents
under standardized experimental conditions.