FIELD TRIAL OF A 3-DIMENSIONAL ACTIVITY MONITOR - COMPARISON WITH SELF-REPORT

Citation
Ce. Matthews et Ps. Freedson, FIELD TRIAL OF A 3-DIMENSIONAL ACTIVITY MONITOR - COMPARISON WITH SELF-REPORT, Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 27(7), 1995, pp. 1071-1078
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Sport Sciences
ISSN journal
01959131
Volume
27
Issue
7
Year of publication
1995
Pages
1071 - 1078
Database
ISI
SICI code
0195-9131(1995)27:7<1071:FTOA3A>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
We examined the ability of the Tritrac-R3D to estimate daily energy ex penditure (EE) and characterize the physical activity patterns of free -living humans. Daily EE was estimated by the Tritrac, a 3-d physical activity log (PAL), and a 7-d recall (SDR). Digital storage of activit y data by the Tritrac allowed us to tabulate the number of minutes the monitor recorded EE at specific activity intensities. Twenty-five men and women (mean age and body mass 26.7 yr, 72.5 kg) wore the monitor for 7 d. The Tritrac significantly underestimated daily EE compared wi th the PAL and SDR, 2552.7 vs 2915.5 kcal . d(-1) and 2530.0 vs 2840.3 kcal . d(-1), respectively (both, P < 0.01). Correlations between the Tritrac and PAL, and the SDR were r = 0.82 and r = 0.77 (both, P < 0. 001). Compared with the PAL, the Tritrac overestimated time accumulate d in sedentary activities (862.7 vs 827.2 min . d(-1)) but underestima ted time accumulated in active behaviors (37.5 vs 78.0 mind(-1)). In c onclusion, these data suggest the Tritrac ranks activity levels simila rly to the PAL and SDR but it significantly underestimates free-living energy expenditure.