Y. Robert et al., ULTRASOUND ASSESSMENT OF OVARIAN STROMA HYPERTROPHY IN HYPERANDROGENISM AND OVULATION DISORDERS - VISUAL ANALYSIS VERSUS COMPUTERIZED QUANTIFICATION, Fertility and sterility, 64(2), 1995, pp. 307-312
Objective: To extend our previous findings on the diagnostic validity
of ovarian stroma hypertrophy in women with hyperandrogenic and/or men
strual disorders. Design: Transvaginal ultrasonography was performed i
n 69 patients complaining of hyperandrogenism and/or menstrual disorde
rs and in 48 normal ovulatory women in early follicular phase. To chec
k the validity of stroma assessment by visual analysis, we used comput
er-assisted analysis, which allowed selective measurement of the strom
al area on a longitudinal ovarian cut. Sensitivity and specificity of
each method were estimated by using the normative data from the contro
l group. Results: Stromal area was considered to be increased using vi
sual analysis and computer assisted analysis in 74% and 61% patients,
respectively. Specificity of this sign was 84% and 96% by visual analy
sis and computer-assisted analysis, respectively. In patients, the inc
rease in stromal area correlated very significantly with the one of to
tal ovarian area, whose upper normal. limit was 5.5 cm(2) per ovary. C
onclusion: Visual assessment of stroma may be misleading in some cases
, with the risk of overestimating its hypertrophy. An increased total
ovarian area >5.5 cm(2) (which can easily be detected by carefully sha
ping a strict longitudinal ovarian cut) has the same diagnostic value
as an increased stromal area by computerized measurement.