This paper explores the management in police-suspect interviews of acc
usations of violent involvement. Eleven officially tape-recorded inter
views between police and suspects were transcribed and analysed and a
basic grammar of violent accusations was identified. Different ways in
which accusations are warranted and contested are discussed and insta
ntiated. It is suggested that the interview participants use two disco
urses of violence: disorderly and justificatory. The paper explores th
eir localized deployment and raises issues concerning their wider ideo
logical implications.