SUBSTANTIAL REGIONAL AND HEMISPHERIC-DIFFERENCES IN BRAIN NITRIC-OXIDE SYNTHASE (NOS) INHIBITION FOLLOWING INTRACEREBROVENTRICULAR ADMINISTRATION OF N-OMEGA-NITRO-L-ARGININE (L-NA) AND ITS METHYL-ESTER (L-NAME)
M. Salter et al., SUBSTANTIAL REGIONAL AND HEMISPHERIC-DIFFERENCES IN BRAIN NITRIC-OXIDE SYNTHASE (NOS) INHIBITION FOLLOWING INTRACEREBROVENTRICULAR ADMINISTRATION OF N-OMEGA-NITRO-L-ARGININE (L-NA) AND ITS METHYL-ESTER (L-NAME), Neuropharmacology, 34(6), 1995, pp. 639-649
Nitric oxide synthase (NOS) enzyme activity was determined in a compre
hensive selection of regions of the rat brain. The effects of lateral
ventricular administration of N-omega-nitro-L-arginine (L-NA, 30 mu g)
and its methyl ester (L-NAME, 3-100 mu g) on NOS activity were examin
ed in the ipsilateral and contralateral areas of 4 of these brain regi
ons and in the cerebellum. NOS activity was determined using a new and
rapid ex vivo assay method which ensures minimal dissociation of the
enzyme-inhibitor complex. Following infusion of L-NAME, NOS activity w
as rapidly and dose-dependently inhibited in all brain regions studied
(cerebral cortex, striatum, hippocampus, cerebellum and thalamus). Ho
wever, NOS activity of brain regions within the contralateral hemisphe
re was inhibited significantly less than in ipsilateral regions, with
the exception of the thalamus. The degree of NOS inhibition varied mar
kedly between brain regions within each hemisphere and correlated with
their ventricular proximity to the site of NOS inhibitor administrati
on. Therefore, NOS in the thalamus was inhibited most effectively and
NOS in the cerebral cortex the least. Within the cerebral cortex furth
er regional differences could be observed, with NOS in the frontal/par
ietal areas inhibited more effectively than NOS in the temporal/occipi
tal areas. Maximal inhibition of NOS was sustained for approx 6 hr aft
er administration of 30 and 100 mu g L-NAME. No inhibition of NOS was
observed 24 hr after administration. Lateral ventricular administratio
n of the metabolite and active moiety of L-NAME, L-NA, resulted in a s
imilar degree of inhibition and time of inhibitory onset. In contrast,
when L-NAME was administered i.p., a significant delay in the onset o
f NOS inhibition was observed in the above brain regions compared to L
-NA. However, no regional or hemispheric differences in NOS inhibition
were detected following peripheral administration of these inhibitors
. These results indicate that central administration of NOS inhibitors
yields a complex pattern of NOS inhibition and that data obtained on
brain physiology following the i.c.v, administration of NOS inhibitors
, or for that matter any other CNS effector, should therefore be inter
preted with extreme caution.