Gm. Chertow et al., NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT WITH BIOELECTRICAL-IMPEDANCE ANALYSIS IN MAINTENANCE HEMODIALYSIS-PATIENTS, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 6(1), 1995, pp. 75-81
Protein energy malnutrition is common among persons with ESRD and cont
ributes substantially to morbidity and mortality, The usual methods of
nutritional assessment, such as anthropometry, can be misleading beca
use of altered tissue hydration. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA
) has been recommended by some as a practical nutritional assessment t
ool but has not been validated in patients with ESRD. Thirty-three sta
ble patients on maintenance hemodialysis were evaluated in an ambulato
ry clinical research center with simultaneous BIA, dual-energy x-ray a
bsorptiometry, and deuterium oxide (D2O) and sodium bromide (NaBr) iso
tope dilution studies. Standard determinations of total body water (TB
W) and body cell mass (BCM) were obtained and compared with values est
imated by BIA. Two separate outpatient BIA measurements were also obta
ined approximately 2 wk before and after the clinical research center
evaluation. BCM estimated by BIA was directly correlated (r = 0.92, P
< 0.0001) with BCM determined by DEXA and NaBr. TBW estimated by BIA w
as directly correlated (r = 0.96, P < 0.0001) with TBW determined by d
euterium oxide dilution. The reactance to resistance ratio (Xc/R) deri
ved from BIA was inversely correlated (r = -0.73, P < 0.0001) with the
extracellular water/TBW ratio determined by NaBr/D2O. Bland-Altman an
alyses showed that for TEW, BIA was in excellent agreement with D2O di
lution. BCM was modestly underestimated by BIA compared with the dual-
energy x-ray absorptiometry/NaBr standard and was adjusted by linear r
egression. The coefficients of variation on repeated BIA measurements
were below 4%, demonstrating test-retest reliability. BIA is a valid a
nd reliable method of nutritional assessment in maintenance hemodialys
is patients.