This brief survey is not a systematic review of the literature on trea
tment-resistent depression (TRD). Rather, in the light of results of c
ontrolled clinical trials, proposals for assessment of TRD are made: F
irst-degree treatment resistance implies nonresponse to standard antid
epressive therapy (two successive adequate treatments with antidepress
ants, combined with induced-wakefulness therapy). Second-degree treatm
ent resistance is defined by nonresponse to alternative treatment stra
tegies (MAO inhibitors, lithium augmentation, electroconvulsive therap
y, infusion therapy) that have proved to be effective in TRD both in c
linical practice and in systematic investigations. In this therapeutic
situation, the only option still open is to resort to previously inef
fective therapy or to turn to (as yet) inadequately established therap
eutic strategies. Criteria for third-degree treatment resistance shoul
d not be based on nonresponse to specific further therapeutic trials b
ut on the duration of the treatment (at least 2 years).