Mk. Keel et al., AN ASSESSMENT OF THE ROLE OF WHITE-TAILED DEER IN THE EPIZOOTIOLOGY OF ANAPLASMOSIS IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED-STATES, Journal of wildlife diseases, 31(3), 1995, pp. 378-385
The role of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in the epizooti
ology of anaplasmosis in the southeastern United States was examined t
hrough retrospective and prospective serosurveys and by experimental i
nfection studies. No serum antibody reactive to Anaplasma marginale wa
s detected with an indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) assay from any
of 1,376 free-ranging deer sampled from 1968 through 1990 from 13 stat
es and Puerto Rico. Thirty-one additional deer from three bovine anapl
asmosis enzootic premises also were negative by IFA and Giemsa-stained
blood films. Three captive deer given A. marginale intravenously deve
loped antibodies 38 to 41 days post-inoculation (DPI) and remained ser
opositive for the duration of the study (161 to 287 DPI). At 42 DPI, r
ickettsemias of approximately 0.0001% infected erythrocytes were obser
ved in all three deer using a DNA probe; low rickettsemias (maximum 0.
01%) persisted through 56, 63, and 87 DPI, respectively. One deer had
a recrudescent infection from 126 to 146 DPI (maximum rickettsemia 0.0
01%). We believe that white-tailed deer in the southeastern United Sta
tes, even though susceptible to A. marginale infection, are not expose
d naturally, even at enzootic sites. Furthermore, white-tailed deer di
d not develop rickettsemias sufficient to support mechanical transmiss
ion by biting flies, which is believed to be the primary means of anap
lasmosis transmission in this region.