P53 MUTATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH BREAST, COLORECTAL, LIVER, LUNG, AND OVARIAN CANCERS

Citation
T. Lasky et E. Silbergeld, P53 MUTATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH BREAST, COLORECTAL, LIVER, LUNG, AND OVARIAN CANCERS, Environmental health perspectives, 104(12), 1996, pp. 1324-1331
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath","Environmental Sciences
ISSN journal
00916765
Volume
104
Issue
12
Year of publication
1996
Pages
1324 - 1331
Database
ISI
SICI code
0091-6765(1996)104:12<1324:PMAWBC>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
In this paper we describe a statistical analysis of the European Molec ular Library p53 mutation database comparing p53 mutations occurring i n breast, colorectal, liver, lung, and ovarian cancers. The analyses s how that mutation hot spots vary by cancer and that base pair changes and predicted amino acid changes in the gene product vary by cancer an d by codon. The analyses use relative frequencies and epidemiologic me asures of effect (prevalence ratios) not applied previously to these d ata. The five cancers in the database with the largest sample sizes we re breast (418), colorectal (398), liver (341), non-small cell lung (3 13), and ovarian cancers (251), for a total of 1,721 reports of p53 mu tations. The five cancers varied considerably in the distribution of m utations over sites, with different hot spots in each cancer. At the s ix most frequently reported codon sites, we compared base pair and ami no acid changes by type of cancer. The comparison of base pair of base pair changes indicated a predominance of particular base pair changes at a codon (for example, C-->T and G-->A changes at Codon 248) and th eir association with specific cancers (C-->T changes with colorectal c ancer and G-->A changes with both colorectal and breast cancers at cod on 248). Comparing predicted amino acid changes by codon and cancer wa s also intriguing as in codons 175 and 273, where arginine to cysteine and arginine to histidine changes were frequent in breast, colorectal , and ovarian cancers. Variations in p53 mutational distributions by m ay be explained by different exposures to carcinogens or by organ-spec ific clonal selection. Further research may be stimulated by this anal ysis.