G. Lindbeck, HOSPITAL AND FLIGHT PROGRAM REIMBURSEMENT FOR PATIENTS TRANSFERRED BYHELICOPTER, The American journal of emergency medicine, 13(4), 1995, pp. 405-409
To determine the reimbursement status of a helicopter aeromedical prog
ram and its sponsoring hospital, the financial records of all patients
transported by a university hospital-based helicopter aeromedical ser
vice during a one-year period of time were examined. The flight progra
m was able to collect only 43% of patient charges, recouping only 24%
of its operating costs. The hospital collected 57% of its total charge
s to patients transported by the helicopter aeromedical program. Reimb
ursers paying on a per-diem basis comprised 36% of the payers and had
collection rates of 50% and 10% for the hospital and flight program, r
espectively. Cost-based insurers constituted 20% of the payers, provid
ed 44% of program revenue, and had collection rates of 92% for the hos
pital and the flight program. If cast-based payers had reimbursed on r
ates similar to the per-diem payers, the hospital would have recovered
only 49% of its charges and the flight program, would have recovered
only 26% of its charges, recouping only 15% of its operating costs. In
conclusion, reimbursement for helicopter aeromedical services and for
the care provided to aeromedically transferred patients is poor. Spon
soring institutions are consequently subjected to significant financia
l stress that possibly challenges the fiscal viability of some program
s. (C) 1995 by W.B. Saunders Company