HOW DO GPS DISCUSS SUBJECTS OTHER THAN ILLNESS - FORMULATING AND EVALUATING A THEORETICAL-MODEL TO EXPLAIN SUCCESSFUL AND LESS SUCCESSFUL APPROACHES TO DISCUSSING PSYCHOSOCIAL ISSUES
E. Arborelius et E. Osterberg, HOW DO GPS DISCUSS SUBJECTS OTHER THAN ILLNESS - FORMULATING AND EVALUATING A THEORETICAL-MODEL TO EXPLAIN SUCCESSFUL AND LESS SUCCESSFUL APPROACHES TO DISCUSSING PSYCHOSOCIAL ISSUES, Patient education and counseling, 25(3), 1995, pp. 257-268
A theoretical model was formed, according to grounded theory, to under
stand how discussions about psychosocial problems might be designed. I
t was used in 19 videotaped consultations where it was considered rele
vant for the physician to take up psychosocial issues. 'Concern' i.e.
that the patient could express that which was most pressing, was used
as an,indicator of outcome. A uniform pattern was observed in those ca
ses where the patients expressed 'concern', in that the physician enco
uraged the patient by using open-ended questions,by flowing up the inf
ormation received, and by having an empathic approach. On the other ha
nd, in consultations where 'concern' was not expressed, it was noticed
that the physician often asked close-ended, leading or negative quest
ions, thus putting an end to the dialogue and, as a consequence, to th
e follow-up phase. Important therapeutic skills would appear to be the
ability to reassure and support the patient as well as to be able to
explain the connection between the patient's symptoms and psychosocial
problems, rather than to solve these problems.