The pilot intervention project at Leros PIKPA asylum was resisted at a
ll levels of its implementation. Resistance ranged from implicit and p
assive to explicit and hostile. It took the form of strong rejective a
ttitudes, defensiveness, and repressed emotions of guilt, shame and fe
ar. It was apparent in efforts to delay, obstruct or reverse the progr
ess of the project and undermine the work of intervention team members
. It was evident in the interactions of the intervention team with all
parties involved in implementing the project: medical professionals a
nd welfare services, the state and local administrations, the central
and local administrations of PIKPA staff, the local community, and the
asylum residents' families and relatives. It is argued that this resi
stance to change is due to the interplay of cultural/attitudinal, psyc
hodynamic and socio-economic factors that are not unique to Leros or G
reece. The analysis of the psychosocial processes involved in resistan
ce to changing the Leros PIKPA asylum may offer insights to the deinst
itutionalisation of custodial settings in general.