A surgeon has many options available to aid in the closure of abdomina
l wall defects in the elective setting. In the emergent setting, activ
e infection or contamination increases the likelihood of infection of
permanent prosthetic material and limits the surgical options. In such
settings, we have used absorbable mesh (Dexon(R)) as an adjunct to fa
scial closure until the acute complications resolve. To evaluate the e
ffectiveness of this technique, we reviewed the outcome of such closur
es in 26 critically ill patients. Between July 1987 and June 1993, 26
patients were identified who had placement of absorbable mesh as part
of an emergent laparotomy at a major urban trauma center. Through a re
trospective chart review, the incidence of complications and outcome o
f the closure were tabulated. Seven patients were initially operated o
n for trauma. Two of the patients had mesh placement at their initial
procedure secondary to fascial loss from trauma. The remainder of the
patients had mesh placement during a subsequent laparotomy for complic
ations related to their initial procedure. Indications for these lapar
otomies included combinations of wound dehiscence, intra-abdominal abs
cess, anastomotic disruption, and perforation. Mesh placement in patie
nts with intra-abdominal infection created effectively open abdominal
wounds that allowed continued abdominal drainage, but required extensi
ve wound care. Despite the absorbable nature of the mesh and often pro
longed hospital stay in these ill patients, none of them required reop
eration for dehiscence, recurrence of intra-abdominal abscess, or infe
ction of the mesh. Seven patients died. In survivors, wound healing wa
s by secondary intent, split thickness skin graft, or mobilization of
full thickness skin to the midline. Seventeen of 19 survivors had thei
r mesh placed ventrally, and all of those who returned for followup ha
d evidence of incisional hernia, which was dealt with electively.