Local, national, and international conflicts over the use of forests b
etween logging companies, governments, environmentalists, native peopl
es, local residents, recreationalists, and others-e.g., the controvers
y over the spotted owl in the old-growth forests of the Northwestern U
nited States and over the rain forests in South America-have shown the
need for philosophical reflection to help clarify the basic issues in
volved. Joining other philosophers who are addressing this problem, my
own response takes the form of a sketch of the rough outlines of a cr
itical environmental hermeneutics. I apply hermeneutics, narrative the
ory, and critical theory to environmental ethics, and use this hermene
utical theory as a method to illuminate the ''deep'' underlying issues
relating to the perception and use of forests. In applying this metho
d, I first take up the analytical problem of identifying, clarifying,
and ordering the different interpretive narratives about forests in te
rms of the underlying epistemological, ethical, and political issues i
nvolved. I then address the critical problem of deciding conflicts bet
ween these different interpretations of forests by working out a set o
f legitimation criteria to which all parties concerned would ideally b
e able to subscribe.