SLEEP WAKING AND EEG POWER SPECTRUM EFFECTS OF A NONSELECTIVE SEROTONIN (5-HT) ANTAGONIST AND A SELECTIVE 5-HT REUPTAKE INHIBITOR GIVEN ALONE AND IN COMBINATION/
B. Bjorvatn et al., SLEEP WAKING AND EEG POWER SPECTRUM EFFECTS OF A NONSELECTIVE SEROTONIN (5-HT) ANTAGONIST AND A SELECTIVE 5-HT REUPTAKE INHIBITOR GIVEN ALONE AND IN COMBINATION/, Sleep, 18(6), 1995, pp. 451-462
Sleep/waking stages, electroencephalogram (EEG) power spectra and beha
vior were studied in rats for 8 hours following intraperitoneal admini
stration of a nonselective serotonin (5-HT) antagonist (0.1 and 2.0 mg
/kg methiothepin) and a selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor (20 mg/kg zi
meldine), given alone and in combination. Consistent with earlier stud
ies, zimeldine gave a biphasic effect on sleep and waking. Waking was
increased and slow wave sleep (SWS)-2 decreased initially, followed by
an increase in SWS-2 in the second 2-hour period. Rapid eye movement
(REM) sleep was reduced throughout the experiment. EEG power densities
were generally reduced in the higher frequencies, but the effect diff
ered somewhat in the different vigilance states and between the fronto
-frontal and fronto-parietal EEG leads. Zimeldine did not change behav
ior. Methiothepin, at 0.1 mg/kg, gave only minor effects by itself, bu
t it blocked the initial waking increase of zimeldine. So did 2.0 mg/k
g methiothepin, but this dose markedly changed sleep/waking stages by
itself: SWS-1 was profoundly increased, whereas waking, SWS-2 and REM
sleep were reduced. Total SWS (TSWS) was markedly increased due to the
SWS-1 increase. Because TSWS was increased while SWS-2 was decreased
following 2.0 mg/kg methiothepin, it is concluded that spindle activit
y was facilitated, whereas slow wave activity was antagonized. Methiot
hepin, at 2.0 mg/kg, also markedly changed EEG power densities within
TSWS and induced cataleptic behavior. It is concluded that the initial
waking increase of zimeldine depends on simultaneous activation of se
veral different 5-HT receptor subtypes. The other zimeldine effects we
re not consistently antagonized, thus the mechanisms behind these effe
cts remain unclear.