K. Akagi et al., MODULATING EFFECTS OF ELLAGIC ACID, VANILLIN AND QUERCETIN IN A RAT MEDIUM-TERM MULTIORGAN CARCINOGENESIS MODEL, Cancer letters, 94(1), 1995, pp. 113-121
Effects of dietary supplementation with the antioxidants ellagic acid,
quercetin and vanillin were examined using a medium term multi-organ
carcinogenesis model in rats. Groups of 10-15 male F344 rats were give
n i.p. injections of diethylnitrosamine (DEN, 100 mg/kg body wt.) and
N-methylnitrosourea (MNU, 20 mg/kg body wt), s.c, injections of 1,2-di
ethylnitrosamine (DMH, 40 mg/kg body wt.), together with 0.05% N-butyl
-N-(4-hydroxybutyl)nitrosamine (BBN) and 0.1% 2,2'-dihydroxy-di-n-prop
ylnitrosamine (DHPN), both in the drinking water, for a total multi pi
e initiation period of 4 weeks (DMBDD treatment). Ellagic acid, querce
tin or vanillin, each at a dose of 1% each in the diet were administer
ed from 1 day before and throughout the carcinogen exposure period, or
after completion of the initiation regimen. All surviving animals wer
e sacrificed at the end of week 36, and major organs were examined his
topathologically. In the small intestine, significant reductions in th
e incidence and number of tumors (adenomas and carcinomas) were observ
ed in the groups administered ellagic acid during (8%, 0.08 +/- 0.29)
or after (8%, 0.08 +/- 0.29) DMBDD treatment, and those receiving quer
cetin after DMBDD treatment (0%) compared to the control value (57%, 1
.07 +/- 1.21). Although the incidences were not statistically signific
ant, slightly decreased numbers of small intestinal tumors were found
in the groups receiving vanillin during (0.33 +/- 0.72), or after (0.4
0 +/- 0.83) DMBDD treatment. The incidence of large intestinal carcino
mas in the group treated with vanillin during DMBDD treatment was sign
ificantly higher (73%) than the control value (21%). These results ind
icated that while ellagic acid and quercetin exerted potent chemopreve
ntive action in both the initiation and promotion stages in the presen
t experimental system, their beneficial effects were restricted to the
small intestine. Since small intestinal carcinomas are very infrequen
t in humans, the advantages of these phenolic compounds for human appl
ication as chemopreventors should not be overestimated.