DYNAMICS OF NON-O1 VIBRIO-CHOLERAE AND FECAL-COLIFORMS IN EXPERIMENTAL STABILIZATION PONDS IN THE ARID REGION OF MARRAKESH, MOROCCO, AND THE EFFECT OF PH, TEMPERATURE, AND SUNLIGHT ON THEIR EXPERIMENTAL SURVIVAL
N. Mezrioui et al., DYNAMICS OF NON-O1 VIBRIO-CHOLERAE AND FECAL-COLIFORMS IN EXPERIMENTAL STABILIZATION PONDS IN THE ARID REGION OF MARRAKESH, MOROCCO, AND THE EFFECT OF PH, TEMPERATURE, AND SUNLIGHT ON THEIR EXPERIMENTAL SURVIVAL, Canadian journal of microbiology, 41(6), 1995, pp. 489-498
We studied the spatial-temporal dynamics of non-O1 Vibrio cholerae num
bers at a stabilization pond treatment plant. This bacterium's seasona
l dynamics were the inverse of those of fecal coliforms, with high lev
els in hot periods and low levels in cold periods. Stabilization pond
treatment did not significantly reduce non-O1 V. cholerae numbers betw
een the system's inflow and outflow points. In contrast, fecal colifor
ms were reduced by 98.95% in hot periods and by 94.91% in cold periods
. Significant rho coefficient values for the Spearman correlation betw
een numbers of non-O1 V. cholerae and temperature and pH of 0.91 and 0
.76, respectively, were found at the system's outflow point. An experi
mental study of the effects of pH, temperature, and sunlight on the su
rvival of non-O1 V. cholerae and fecal coliforms confirmed the inverse
behaviour of the two bacterial groups noted in the stabilization pond
s. Alkaline pH values of 8 and 8.8 promoted the survival of non-O1 V.
cholerae and inhibited that of Escherichia coli. Low temperatures (8 d
egrees C) prolonged E. coli survival (k = 0.002/h), while a temperatur
e of 23 degrees C reduced it markedly (k = 0.022/h). Non-O1 V. cholera
e did not survive as well as E. coli at 8 degrees C (k = 0.009/h). The
effect of temperature on non-O1 V. cholerae appeared to be closely li
nked to nutrient levels. Non-O1 V. cholerae appeared to be less sensit
ive to sunlight than E. coli whose survival was markedly reduced, part
icularly during summer periods. Non-O1 V. cholerae and E. coli did not
behave in the same way in water subjected to stabilization pond treat
ment. The use of fecal coliforms as an indicator of the potential heal
th hazard of the effluent may not be adequate for this treatment proce
dure.