According to a contemporary school of thought there is a specific fema
le approach to ethics which is based not on abstract ''male'' ethical
principles or rules, but on ''care''. Nurses have taken a keen interes
t in these female approaches to ethics. Drawing on the views expounded
by Carol Gilligan and Nel Noddings, nurses claim that a female ''ethi
cs of care'' better captures their moral experiences than a traditiona
l male ''ethics of justice''. This paper argues that ''care'' is best
understood in a dispositional sense, that is, as sensitivity and respo
nsiveness to the particularities of a situation and the needs of ''con
crete'' others. While ''care'', in this sense, is necessary for ethics
, it is not sufficient. Ethics needs ''justice'' as well as ''care''.
If women and nurses excessively devalue principles and norms, they wil
l be left without the theoretical tools to condemn some actions or pra
ctices, and to defend others. They will, like generations of nurses be
fore them, be condemned to silence.