CLINICAL ETHICS AND NURSING - YES TO CARING, BUT NO TO A FEMALE ETHICS OF CARE

Authors
Citation
H. Kuhse, CLINICAL ETHICS AND NURSING - YES TO CARING, BUT NO TO A FEMALE ETHICS OF CARE, Bioethics, 9(3-4), 1995, pp. 207-219
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, Legal
Journal title
ISSN journal
02699702
Volume
9
Issue
3-4
Year of publication
1995
Pages
207 - 219
Database
ISI
SICI code
0269-9702(1995)9:3-4<207:CEAN-Y>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
According to a contemporary school of thought there is a specific fema le approach to ethics which is based not on abstract ''male'' ethical principles or rules, but on ''care''. Nurses have taken a keen interes t in these female approaches to ethics. Drawing on the views expounded by Carol Gilligan and Nel Noddings, nurses claim that a female ''ethi cs of care'' better captures their moral experiences than a traditiona l male ''ethics of justice''. This paper argues that ''care'' is best understood in a dispositional sense, that is, as sensitivity and respo nsiveness to the particularities of a situation and the needs of ''con crete'' others. While ''care'', in this sense, is necessary for ethics , it is not sufficient. Ethics needs ''justice'' as well as ''care''. If women and nurses excessively devalue principles and norms, they wil l be left without the theoretical tools to condemn some actions or pra ctices, and to defend others. They will, like generations of nurses be fore them, be condemned to silence.