SYNTHESIS, STRUCTURE, AND PHARMACOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF THE STEREOISOMERS OF FURNIDIPINE

Citation
R. Alajarin et al., SYNTHESIS, STRUCTURE, AND PHARMACOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF THE STEREOISOMERS OF FURNIDIPINE, Journal of medicinal chemistry, 38(15), 1995, pp. 2830-2841
Citations number
47
Categorie Soggetti
Chemistry Medicinal
ISSN journal
00222623
Volume
38
Issue
15
Year of publication
1995
Pages
2830 - 2841
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-2623(1995)38:15<2830:SSAPEO>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
The synthesis and pharmacological activities of the four stereoisomers of methyl tetrahydrofuran-2-ylmethyl 1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarbox ylate(furnidipine) are reported. The four isomers were synthesized by a modified Hantzsch synthesis by reaction of (-)- or (+)-tetrahydrofur an-2-ylmethyl 3-aminocrotonate and methyl 2-[(2'-nitrophenyl)methylene ]acetoacetate or, alternatively, by re action of (-)- or (+)-tetrahydr ofuran-2-ylmethyl 2-[(2'-nitrophenyl)methylene]acetoacetate and methyl 3-aminocrotonate. The 1:1 diastereomeric mixtures thus obtained were separated by chromatography, using poly(D-phenylglycine) as the chiral stationary phase. The enantiomeric purity of the stereoisomers was de termined by a high-performance liquid chromatography-chiral stationary phase technique (HPLC-CSP). Attempts to obtain crystals of a single s tereoisomer failed in different solvents, while methanol crystallizati on of the product obtained from (+)-tetrahydrofuran-2-ylmethyl 2-[(2'- nitrophenyl)methylene]acetoacetate and methyl 3-aminocrotonate yielded good-quality crystals of the most insoluble racemate which proved to be a mixture of the (SS)/(RR) enantiomers by X-ray crystallography. Co nformational analysis of the stereoisomers, assuming rotation of the a ryl substituent and ester groups, shows small energy differences (abou t 4 kcal . mol(-1)) between the most and the least favorable conformat ions. Binding studies were performed using [H-3]isradipine as a refere nce ligand. The results showed stereospecificity of the furnidipine is omers in brain, ileum, and cardiac tissues, the (SS)- and (SR)-isomers clearly being more potent than their (RR)- and (RS)-enantiomers. The (SS)- and (SR)-isomers were also more selective on cerebral tissue whe n compared with ileal and cardiac preparations.