Rh. Karlson et Hm. Taylor, ALTERNATIVE PREDICTIONS FOR OPTIMAL DISPERSAL IN RESPONSE TO LOCAL CATASTROPHIC MORTALITY, Theoretical population biology, 47(3), 1995, pp. 321-330
What dispersal strategy should be employed by an organism in response
to local catastrophic mortality? Here we contrast predictions from an
analytical solution derived from an ESS model which optimizes competit
ive ability (Comins et al., 1980) with those from a stochastic, branch
ing process model (Karlson and Taylor, 1992) which maximizes survivors
hip of a clonal lineage. The optimal dispersal fraction varies directl
y with the probability of local extinction in the ESS model, yet varie
s inversely with this probability over much of the parameter space in
the latter model. In order to conform more closely with the assumption
s of the ESS model, we have modified the branching process model to ha
ve a random, Poisson-distributed number of offspring and compared the
predictions of these models. Both models invoke dispersal as an escape
from local extinction and predict mixed dispersal strategies over a w
ide range of conditions. However, increasing local catastrophic mortal
ity favors more dispersal in the ESS model, but it can be so severe in
the branching process model that no dispersal strategy is adaptive. I
n this model, the predicted optimal proportion of dispersed offspring
is highest at low to intermediate levels of catastrophic mortality dep
ending on the total number of offspring produced. We suggest that this
observed discrepancy is sufficiently large to warrant empirical tests
of these qualitatively different predictions. (C) 1995 Academic Press
, Inc.