Jn. Wunsche et al., COMPARISON OF 4 METHODS FOR ESTIMATING TOTAL LIGHT INTERCEPTION BY APPLE-TREES OF VARYING FORMS, HortScience, 30(2), 1995, pp. 272-276
Four methods of estimating daily light interception (fisheye photograp
hy with image analysis, multiple-light sensors, ceptometer, and point
grid) were compared using various apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) tree
forms: slender spindle, Y- and T-trellises, and vertical palmette. Int
eractions of tree form, time of day, and atmospheric conditions with l
ight interception estimates were examined. All methods were highly cor
related to each other (r(2)>0.92) for estimated daily mean percent tot
al light interception by the various tree forms, except that the point
grid method values were slightly lower. Interactions were found among
tree form, time of day, and diffuse/direct radiation balance on estim
ated light interception, suggesting that several readings over the day
are needed under clear skies, especially in upright canopies. The sim
ilar results obtained by using the point grid method (counting shaded/
exposed points on a grid under the canopy) on clear days may allow rap
id, simple, and inexpensive estimates of orchard light interception.