One to five years after successful low vision rehabilitation, 199 pati
ents with age-related macular degeneration were asked by means of a qu
estionnaire whether they still used their low vision aids and whether
they were satisfied with the low vision counceling. We received feedba
ck from 66% of the patients. 20 patients had already passed away. 74%
of the 112 answering patients still use a low vision aid today. Three-
quarters of them still use the originally prescribed low vision aid. I
nterestingly enough, the daily reading time was rather short, only 16%
of the patients read more than 1 hour per day, 42% read somewhat more
and 13% somewhat less than 10 minutes per day. Retrospectively, 81% o
f all responding patients found their low vision counceling at least a
little, more of them quite or very helpful. These numbers suggest, th
at the initial labor of patiently examining and training older, visual
ly handicapped patients is worthwhile.