This survey was conducted by 28 urologists members of the ANFUC who re
ported rectal wounds observed during radical prostatectomy procedures
performed for cancer. There were 1.816 procedures reported: 1.785 supr
apubic prostatectomies and 28 perineal operations. Kraske access was u
sed in 3 cases. There were 33 wounds to the rectum reported by 17 oper
ators including 31 in suprapubic prostatectomies (1.7% of the operatio
ns) and 2 after transperineal operations (7.14%). Preoperative radioth
erapy was never used and mechanical preparation was performed in most
of the cases with rectal complications (27/33). The wound was sutured
in all cases and a colonic derivation was required in 4. Retrospective
ly this procedure was judged unnecessary in 2 or 3 cases. The post-ope
rative period was uneventful in all cases and the derivations were clo
sed 2 or 3 months later. The conclusions drawn from this survey were t
he following: the rate of rectal complications in radical prostatectom
y is higher in the perineal route. When no preoperative radiotherapy h
as been performed, simple suture of the rectal wound is sufficient and
colonic derivation is not always necessary. It does not appear necess
ary to interpose an epiploic flap in such cases which would have the d
isadvantage of requiring opening the peritoneal cavity. These consider
ations are only applicable to the nonirradiated rectum. Preoperative r
adiotherapy would undoubtedly have a major effect, but we have had no
experience in this series.