O. Sturniolo et al., A NUMERICAL SENSITIVITY STUDY ON THE BACKSCATTERING AT 35.8 GHZ FROM PRECIPITATION-SIZED HYDROMETEORS, Radio science, 30(4), 1995, pp. 903-919
In this paper we study the behavior of backscattering quantities that
are of primary importance for the interpretation of millimeter-wavelen
gth multiparameter radar observations (i.e., the backscattering cross
sections at horizontal and vertical polarization, the differential ref
lectivity, and the linear and circular depolarization ratios) for rota
tionally symmetric nonspherical particles having a conical-elongated f
orm that can be continuously varied. The scattering calculations at 35
.8 GHz have been carried out using a computer code based on the Extend
ed Boundary Condition Method for liquid water and soft-ice hydrometeor
s in the equal-volume sphere size ranges 0.05 less than or equal to r(
ev) less than or equal to 0.4 cm and 0.1 less than or equal to r(ev) l
ess than or equal to 1.0 cm, respectively. The calculated backscatteri
ng quantities are examined for the effects of four factors: particle s
ize, conicity, elongation, and orientation with respect to the inciden
t field (i.e., radar elevation and particle canting). Results of this
sensitivity study show that the effects of nonsphericity tend to incre
ase as size increases; for hydrometeors smaller than r(ev) approximate
to 0.4-0.5 cm, however, oscillations dominate the behavior of the con
sidered backscattering quantities with size. Below such sizes, particl
e elongation and radar elevation are by far the main factors affecting
the backscattering. As size increases, however, particle conicity bec
omes more and more important; at the largest sizes it is comparable to
particle elongation. Our results also show that depending on particle
shape, even limited variations in radar elevation or in particle orie
ntation due to hydrometeor canting may significantly affect millimeter
radar measurements of precipitating clouds. In any case, generally th
ere is a considerable (often, large) sensitivity to particle parameter
s; in our view this augurs well for the existence of backscattering ''
signatures'' that could be used to characterize the observed hydromete
ors. On the other hand, it also implies that interpretation of millime
ter radar measurements should be based on a statistical approach, rath
er than on a deterministic one, due to the variability of hydrometeor
shape and orientation in nature and to their imperfect a priori inform
ation.