We show that splitting an award can result in lower expected procureme
nt costs, even in a one-time procurement setting, as long as entering
the bidding competition is costly. For sufficiently risk-averse bidder
s, the split award mechanism provides additional insurance against the
possibility of losing the bid and, therefore, any bidding costs. This
result contrasts with previous theoretical works which focus on one-t
ime procurement and have concluded that multiple sourcing increases ex
pected procurement costs.