Wh. Chow et al., THE RELATION OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE AND ITS TREATMENT TO ADENOCARCINOMAS OF THE ESOPHAGUS AND GASTRIC CARDIA, JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association, 274(6), 1995, pp. 474-477
Objective.-To examine the relationship of gastrointestinal disorders a
nd their treatment to the risk of adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and
gastric cardia (AEC). Design.-A medical record-based case-control stu
dy, with data collected on a standardized form by a trained abstractor
, blind to the case-control status. Setting.-A large prepaid health pl
an. Subjects.-Case patients were plan members newly diagnosed with his
tologically confirmed AEC from 1986 to 1992. For each of the 196 eligi
ble case patients, one control was selected who matched for membership
at time of diagnosis, sex, year of birth, and duration of membership.
Main Outcome Measures.-Association between AEC and history of gastroe
sophageal conditions and their treatment. Conditional logistic regress
ion procedures were used for calculation of odds ratios (ORs) and corr
esponding 95% confidence intervals (Cls), with adjustment for race, sm
oking status, and body mass index. Medications were grouped into H-2 a
ntagonists (cimetidine, ranitidine, famotidine, and nizatidine) and an
ticholinergics (propantheline bromide, dicyclomine hydrochloride, Donn
atal [combination of atropine sulfate, hyoscyamine sulfate, phenobarbi
tal, and scopolamine hydrobromide], and Librax [combination of chlordi
azepoxide hydrochloride and clidinium bromide]). Results.-Significant
twofold or greater risks of AEC were associated with a history of esop
hageal reflux, hiatal hernia, esophagitis/esophageal ulcer, and diffic
ulty swallowing. The ORs increased with increasing number of these con
ditions. Although a fourfold risk was linked to four or more prescript
ions for H-2 antagonists, the risk was reduced to 1.5 (95% CI, 0.4 to
5.4) after adjusting for the predisposing conditions. Further analysis
revealed that the excess risk was restricted to persons with a histor
y of gastroesophageal reflux and related conditions. No association wa
s observed for overall use of anticholinergics. However, after adjustm
ent for predisposing conditions, ORs decreased with increasing number
of prescriptions for anticholinergics (P for trend=.08). Conclusions.-
This study provides reassuring findings that use of H-2 antagonists an
d anticholinergics does not increase AEC risk. It also quantifies the
elevated risk of AEC associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Further research into reflux disease and the production of premalignan
t epithelial changes may help elucidate carcinogenic mechanisms and me
asures aimed at early detection and prevention of AEC.