Ja. Katz et al., HISTOPATHOLOGIC CHANGES IN PRIMATE SPINAL-CORD AFTER SINGLE AND REPEATED EPIDURAL PHENOL ADMINISTRATION, Regional anesthesia, 20(4), 1995, pp. 283-290
Background and Objectives. Epidural phenol for control of pain and spa
sticity has been advocated for clinical use. This study determined the
histopathologic changes that follow single and repeated epidural admi
nistration of phenol in saline in nonhuman primates.Methods. Nine prim
ates received 0.5 mL of either 3% phenol in saline (n = 4) or 6% pheno
l in saline (n = 5) via lumbar epidural injection. Two additional prim
ates received three consecutive daily epidural doses of 0.5 mL of 3% p
henol in saline. Finally, 5 unoperated primates and 5 primates that re
ceived only 2 mL, of radiographic contrast material served as control
subjects. Two weeks after the epidural injection, spinal cords were re
moved and processed for hislopathologic study by a neuropathologist bl
inded to the solution administered.Results. None of the control animal
s demonstrated histopathologic changes. One animal that received 6% ph
enol died 3 days after injection. All phenol-treated animals demonstra
ted predomi nantly posterior root damage. Spinal cord damage was seen
in all animals receiving 6% phenol, in 2 animals receiving 3% phenol s
ingle doses, and in neither animal receiving 3% phenol multiple doses.
Anterior root damage occurred in all phenol-treated animals except th
e 4 that received single 3% phenol injections. Animals that received 6
% phenol demonstrated greater lower extremity motor weakness than thos
e in the other groups, but no clear correlation existed between extent
of histopathologic changes and motor weakness. Conclusions. Motor wea
kness, anterior root damage, and direct cord injury were noted in prim
ates following epidural administration of phenol in concentrations bel
ow what has been reported for clinical use in humans. Since it is more
difficult to control the spread of epidural versus subarachnoid pheno
l, the risks of epidural phenol may outweigh the benefits relative to
subarachnoid administration.