COMPARISON OF THE STORZ BIFOCAL ZONAL AND THE 3M DIFFRACTIVE MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENSES

Citation
Ie. Boesten et al., COMPARISON OF THE STORZ BIFOCAL ZONAL AND THE 3M DIFFRACTIVE MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENSES, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 21(4), 1995, pp. 437-441
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,Ophthalmology
ISSN journal
08863350
Volume
21
Issue
4
Year of publication
1995
Pages
437 - 441
Database
ISI
SICI code
0886-3350(1995)21:4<437:COTSBZ>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity after cataract surgery were eva luated in best-case eyes that received a Storz bifocal zonal intraocul ar lens (IOL) or a 3M diffractive multifocal IOL. A group of eyes with a monofocal IOL was used as a control, Postoperatively, all eyes had a best corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better. At near, wearing th e best distance correction, 86.0% of the Storz group and 94.5% of the 3M group had a visual acuity of 20/40 or better. Both the Storz and 3M groups had a significantly greater loss in visual acuity in dim light at the lowest contrast levels than the monofocal group, Under bright light, the Storz group's contrast sensitivity was not significantly di fferent from that of the monofocal groups; however, the 3M group's con trast sensitivity decreased at all levels of contrast. The Storz lens pert:ormed slightly but significantly better than the 3M lens in brigh t light (96% and 25% Regan levels), perhaps because of the difference in IOL optics or small differences in the incidence of posterior capsu le opacification, for which this study was not controlled, In the Stor z and 3M groups, distance visual acuity was better than distance visua l acuity using a minus addition, which makes the patient use the near portion of the optic.