Ie. Boesten et al., COMPARISON OF THE STORZ BIFOCAL ZONAL AND THE 3M DIFFRACTIVE MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENSES, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 21(4), 1995, pp. 437-441
Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity after cataract surgery were eva
luated in best-case eyes that received a Storz bifocal zonal intraocul
ar lens (IOL) or a 3M diffractive multifocal IOL. A group of eyes with
a monofocal IOL was used as a control, Postoperatively, all eyes had
a best corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better. At near, wearing th
e best distance correction, 86.0% of the Storz group and 94.5% of the
3M group had a visual acuity of 20/40 or better. Both the Storz and 3M
groups had a significantly greater loss in visual acuity in dim light
at the lowest contrast levels than the monofocal group, Under bright
light, the Storz group's contrast sensitivity was not significantly di
fferent from that of the monofocal groups; however, the 3M group's con
trast sensitivity decreased at all levels of contrast. The Storz lens
pert:ormed slightly but significantly better than the 3M lens in brigh
t light (96% and 25% Regan levels), perhaps because of the difference
in IOL optics or small differences in the incidence of posterior capsu
le opacification, for which this study was not controlled, In the Stor
z and 3M groups, distance visual acuity was better than distance visua
l acuity using a minus addition, which makes the patient use the near
portion of the optic.