L. Shorelesserson et al., AUTOLOGOUS PLATELET-RICH PLASMAPHERESIS - RISK VERSUS BENEFIT IN REPEAT CARDIAC OPERATIONS, Anesthesia and analgesia, 81(2), 1995, pp. 229-235
Preoperative platelet-rich plasmapheresis has been suggested as a mean
s of reducing homologous blood transfusions in cardiac surgical patien
ts. The current study evaluated this technique in patients undergoing
repeat cardiac operations. Fifty-two patients undergoing repeat myocar
dial revascularization and/or valve replacement were evaluated in a pr
ospective randomized controlled study design. Autologous platelet-rich
plasma (PRP) was harvested after the induction of anesthesia in the e
xperimental group. After reversal of heparin, each patient received hi
s or her autologous plasma. Patients in the control group did not have
plasmapheresis and received standard transfusion therapy if coagulati
on variables were abnormal and a coagulopathy was clinically evident.
Routine coagulation tests, thromboelastography (TEG), perioperative bl
eeding, and transfusion requirements were compared in the two groups.
Forty-four patients completed the study. A significantly larger volume
of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) was transfused in the PRP group tha
n in the control group (P = 0.03). Platelet and fresh frozen plasma (F
FP) transfusions did not differ between the two groups. Mediastinal tu
be drainage did not differ between the two groups. During PRP infusion
, 60% of the patients required treatment for moderate hypotension (mea
n arterial pressure [MAP] < 60 mm Hg). Only 16% of control patients re
quired treatment for hypotension during the comparable time period (P
< 0.05). No patient who completed the study returned to the operating
room for postoperative bleeding. These data suggest that PRP did not r
educe postbypass bleeding or transfusion requirements in repeat cardia
c surgical patients. Moreover, the incidence of hypotension during PRP
reinfusion introduces a potential risk to the procedure in the absenc
e of any obvious benefit.