EVALUATING POOLED EVIDENCE FROM THE REEMPLOYMENT BONUS EXPERIMENTS

Citation
Pt. Decker et Cj. Oleary, EVALUATING POOLED EVIDENCE FROM THE REEMPLOYMENT BONUS EXPERIMENTS, The Journal of human resources, 30(3), 1995, pp. 534-550
Citations number
8
Categorie Soggetti
Economics,"Industrial Relations & Labor
ISSN journal
0022166X
Volume
30
Issue
3
Year of publication
1995
Pages
534 - 550
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-166X(1995)30:3<534:EPEFTR>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Social experiments conducted in Pennsylvania and Washington tested the effect of offering Unemployment Insurance (UI) claimants a cash bonus for rapid reemployment. This paper combines data from the two experim ents and uses a consistent framework to evaluate the experiments and d etermine,vith greater certainty the extent to which a reemployment bon us can affect economic outcomes. Bonus offers in each of the experimen ts generated statistically significant but relatively modest reduction s in UI receipt. Since the estimated impacts on UI receipt were modest , the reemployment bonuses did not generate the UI savings necessary t o pay for administering and paying the bonuses. Hence, contrary to ear lier findings from a bonus experiment conducted in Illinois, findings from the Pennsylvania and Washington experiments strongly suggest that a reemployment bonus is not a cost-effective method of speeding the r eemployment of UI claimants.