A DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF ONCE-DAILY METOPROLOL CONTROLLED-RELEASEAND ATENOLOL IN THE TREATMENT OF CHINESE PATIENTS WITH MILD-TO-MODERATE HYPERTENSION
Mf. Chen et al., A DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF ONCE-DAILY METOPROLOL CONTROLLED-RELEASEAND ATENOLOL IN THE TREATMENT OF CHINESE PATIENTS WITH MILD-TO-MODERATE HYPERTENSION, Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 9(3), 1995, pp. 401-406
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy","Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
The efficacy and tolerability of controlled-release metoprolol (metopr
olol CR/ZOK), 100-200 mg, and atenolol, 50-100 mg, once daily was comp
ared in Chinese patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.
The study was of a randomized, double-blind, two-way crossover design
. The active treatment periods lasted 4 weeks each and were preceded b
y a 4-week placebo run-in period. The two double-blind phases were sep
arated by a 2-week washout period on placebo. Blood pressures and hear
t rates were measured at rest in each 2-week visit and during exercise
at the end of each treatment period. Twenty-four patients (M/F = 14/1
0) were valid for efficacy analysis. Their ages ranged from 39 to 68,
with a mean of 53.5 years. The rest supine blood pressure and heart ra
te before active treatment was 160 +/- 15/106 +/- 6 mmHg and 75 +/- 14
beats/min (mean +/- SD), respectively. A responder was defined as exh
ibiting a supine diastolic blood pressure less than or equal to 90 mmH
g or a supine diastolic blood pressure reduction of at least 10% of th
e baseline level. Both agents had high response rate: 88% and 92% of a
ll patients responded to metoprolol CR/ZOK and atenolol, respectively.
Both active treatments considerably reduced resting systolic and dias
tolic blood pressures and heart rates as compared with baseline (p < 0
.001), respectively. With controlled-release metoprolol, a more pronou
nced beta(1) blockade was obtained than with atenolol, which was expre
ssed as a significant reduction in exercise induced heart rate at the
highest comparable workload compared with placebo (p < 0.05). These fi
ndings are compatible with those reported from western populations.